This isn't an essay - it is just a assortment of notes which will be the foundation of an 800 word assessment of two articles about the place of humanities in university analyses, and the functions of mass communication.
Part 1 (800 text - 30%)
You will get two brief readings by the finish of Week 3 of the Semester. Identify the approach or approaches found in each, and with regards to the features and types of the determined approaches as presented in Subject components, justify your answer.
Andrew Riemer's document, "Cannon or Fodder?" (The Weekend Australian, 16-17 November 1996) could be determined as having both Idealist and Leavisite approaches within the written text. This is indicated in a number of passages of the written text:
"My colleagues in the Section of English had been irresponsible.They were trivialising the self-discipline.by making it possible for undergraduates to sidestep the so-named canonical writers.towards whatever transient phenomenon or author of small talent been their latest obsession."
"They were reprehensible . in encouraging their students to impose simple sub-Marxist, sub-feminist templates on sophisticated and mysterious works of literature . Milton's Eve reduced to only victim of the patriarchy."
"Alluring though it may be, we can not recover intellectual integrity by turning again the clock."
"Cannon or Fodder?" (The Weekend Australian, 16-17 November 1996)
When looking at the approaches because they are presented in the topic Materials, one is able to identify